@article {KNZ001965, title = {Global change effects on plant communities are magnified by time and the number of global change factors imposed}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {116}, year = {2019}, pages = {17867-17873}, abstract = {

Global change drivers (GCDs) are expected to alter community structure and consequently, the services that ecosystems provide. Yet, few experimental investigations have examined effects of GCDs on plant community structure across multiple ecosystem types, and those that do exist present conflicting patterns. In an unprecedented global synthesis of over 100 experiments that manipulated factors linked to GCDs, we show that herbaceous plant community responses depend on experimental manipulation length and number of factors manipulated. We found that plant communities are fairly resistant to experimentally manipulated GCDs in the short term (\<10 y). In contrast, long-term (\≥10 y) experiments show increasing community divergence of treatments from control conditions. Surprisingly, these community responses occurred with similar frequency across the GCD types manipulated in our database. However, community responses were more common when 3 or more GCDs were simultaneously manipulated, suggesting the emergence of additive or synergistic effects of multiple drivers, particularly over long time periods. In half of the cases, GCD manipulations caused a difference in community composition without a corresponding species richness difference, indicating that species reordering or replacement is an important mechanism of community responses to GCDs and should be given greater consideration when examining consequences of GCDs for the biodiversity\–ecosystem function relationship. Human activities are currently driving unparalleled global changes worldwide. Our analyses provide the most comprehensive evidence to date that these human activities may have widespread impacts on plant community composition globally, which will increase in frequency over time and be greater in areas where communities face multiple GCDs simultaneously.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.1819027116}, url = {https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/08/14/1819027116}, author = {Kimberly J. Komatsu and M.L. Avolio and Lemoine, Nathan P. and Isbell, Forest and Grman, Emily and Houseman, Gregory R. and Koerner, Sally E. and Johnson, D.S. and K.R. Wilcox and Juha M. Alatalo and Anderson, J.P. and Aerts, R. and S.G. Baer and Baldwin, Andrew H. and Bates, J. and Beierkuhnlein, C. and Belote, R.T. and John M. Blair and Bloor, J.M.G. and Bohlen, P.J. and Edward W. Bork and Elizabeth H. Boughton and W.D. Bowman and Britton, Andrea J. and Cahill, James F. and Chaneton, Enrique J. and Chiariello, N.R. and Cheng, Jimin. and Scott. L. Collins and Cornelissen, J.H.C. and G. Du and Eskelinen, Anu and Firn, Jennifer and Foster, B. and Gough, L. and Gross, K. and Hallett, L.M. and Han, X. and Harmens, H. and Hovenden, M.J. and Jagerbrand, A. and Jentsch, A. and Kern, Christel and Klanderud, Kari and Alan K. Knapp and Kreyling, Juergen and Li, W. and Luo, Yiqi and McCulley, R.L. and McLaren, Jennie R. and Megonigal, Patrick and J.W. Morgan and Onipchenko, Vladimir and Pennings, S.C. and Prev{\'e}y, J.S. and Price, Jodi N. and P.B. Reich and Robinson, Clare H. and Russell, L.F. and Sala, O.E. and Seabloom, E.W. and M.D. Smith and Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. and Souza, Lara and K.N. Suding and Suttle, B.K. and Svejcar, T. and Tilman, David and Tognetti, P. and Turkington, R. and White, S. and Xu, Zhuwen and Yahdjian, L. and Yu, Q. and Zhang, Pengfei and Zhang, Yunhai} } @article {KNZ001747, title = {Climate modifies response of non-native and native species richness to nutrient enrichment}, journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences}, volume = {3719371}, year = {2016}, pages = {20150273}, abstract = {

Ecosystem eutrophication often increases domination by non-natives and causes displacement of native taxa. However, variation in environmental conditions may affect the outcome of interactions between native and non-native taxa in environments where nutrient supply is elevated. We examined the interactive effects of eutrophication, climate variability and climate average conditions on the success of native and non-native plant species using experimental nutrient manipulations replicated at 32 grassland sites on four continents. We hypothesized that effects of nutrient addition would be greatest where climate was stable and benign, owing to reduced niche partitioning. We found that the abundance of non-native species increased with nutrient addition independent of climate; however, nutrient addition increased non-native species richness and decreased native species richness, with these effects dampened in warmer or wetter sites. Eutrophication also altered the time scale in which grassland invasion responded to climate, decreasing the importance of long-term climate and increasing that of annual climate. Thus, climatic conditions mediate the responses of native and non-native flora to nutrient enrichment. Our results suggest that the negative effect of nutrient addition on native abundance is decoupled from its effect on richness, and reduces the time scale of the links between climate and compositional change.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, issn = {0962-8436}, doi = {10.1098/rstb.2015.0273}, url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0273}, author = {Flores-Moreno, H. and P.B. Reich and Lind, E.M. and L.L. Sullivan and Seabloom, E.W. and Yahdjian, L. and MacDougall, A.S. and Reichmann, L.G. and J. Alberti and B{\'a}ez, S. and J.D. Bakker and Cadotte, M.W. and Caldeira, M.C. and Chaneton, E.J. and D{\textquoteright}Antonio, C.M. and Fay, P.A. and Firn, J. and Hagenah, N. and Harpole, W. S. and Iribarne, O. and Kirkman, K.P. and Knops, J.M. H. and Kimberly J. La Pierre and Laungani, R. and Leakey, A.D. B. and McCulley, R.L. and Joslin L. Moore and Pascual, J. and E.T. Borer} } @article {KNZ001538, title = {Coordinated distributed experiments: an emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science}, journal = {Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment}, volume = {11}, year = {2013}, pages = {147 -155}, abstract = {

There is a growing realization among scientists and policy makers that an increased understanding of today\&$\#$39;s environmental issues requires international collaboration and data synthesis. Meta-analyses have served this role in ecology for more than a decade, but the different experimental methodologies researchers use can limit the strength of the meta-analytic approach. Considering the global nature of many environmental issues, a new collaborative approach, which we call coordinated distributed experiments (CDEs), is needed that will control for both spatial and temporal scale, and that encompasses large geographic ranges. Ecological CDEs, involving standardized, controlled protocols, have the potential to advance our understanding of general principles in ecology and environmental science.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1890/110279}, url = {https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/110279}, author = {Fraser, L.H. and Henry, H.A. and Carlyle, C.N. and White, S.R. and Beierkuhnlein, C. and Cahill, J.F. and Casper, B.B. and Cleland, E.E. and Scott. L. Collins and Dukes, J.S. and Alan K. Knapp and Lind, E. and Long, R. and Luo, Y. and P.B. Reich and M.D. Smith and Sternberg, M. and Turkington, R.} } @article {KNZ001623, title = {The effect of experimental warming and precipitation change on proteolytic enzyme activity: positive feedbacks to nitrogen availability are not universal}, journal = {Global Change Biology}, volume = {18}, year = {2012}, pages = {2617 -2625}, abstract = {

Nitrogen regulates the Earth\&$\#$39;s climate system by constraining the terrestrial sink for atmospheric CO2. Proteolytic enzymes are a principal driver of the within-system cycle of soil nitrogen, yet there is little to no understanding of their response to climate change. Here, we use a single methodology to investigate potential proteolytic enzyme activity in soils from 16 global change experiments. We show that regardless of geographical location or experimental manipulation (i.e., temperature, precipitation, or both), all sites plotted along a single line relating the response ratio of potential proteolytic activity to soil moisture deficit, the difference between precipitation and evapotranspiration. In particular, warming and reductions in precipitation stimulated potential proteolytic activity in mesic sites \– temperate and boreal forests, arctic tundra \– whereas these manipulations suppressed potential activity in dry grasslands. This study provides a foundation for a simple representation of the impacts of climate change on a central component of the nitrogen cycle.

}, keywords = {LTER-KNZ}, doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02685.x}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02685.x}, author = {Brozostek, E.R. and John M. Blair and Dukes, J.S. and Frey, S.D. and Hobbie, S.E. and Melillo, J.M. and Mitchell, R.J. and Pendall, E.S. and P.B. Reich and Shaver, G.R. and Stefanskii, A. and Tjoelker, M.G. and Finzi, A.C.} }