02048nas a2200265 4500008004100000245007800041210006900119300001300188490000700201520130200208653001701510653001901527653001401546653000901560653001001569653000801579653001301587653001001600653001201610653002601622100001701648700002001665700002001685856007701705 2012 eng d00aDrought-mediated stem and belowground bud dynamics in restored grasslands0 aDroughtmediated stem and belowground bud dynamics in restored gr a470 -4780 v153 a
Question Does the below-ground bud bank mediate response to drought in restored grasslands? Location Platte River Valley region of south-central Nebraska, USA. Methods We imposed severe drought for one growing season using rainfall manipulation structures and measured the response of above- and below-ground plant communities (ramet and below-ground bud densities) with respect to non-drought controls during the drought year and a recovery year. Results Drought reduced below-ground bud bank density and above-ground stem density. However, bud bank density recovered, and bud production was higher on previously droughted subplots relative to controls in the year following drought. The response of below-ground bud and above-ground stem density to drought differed according to functional identity (C3 grass, C4 grass, and forb), with forbs least resistant to, but having the greatest recovery from, drought. Conclusions While overall density in restored grasslands was resilient, drought effects on below-ground bud banks may have longer-term impacts on plant community structure. Reduced density above- or below-ground during the growing season following drought may allow for the persistence of species relatively more reliant on recruitment from seed banks in favourable micro-sites.
10aBelow-ground10aClimate change10aCommunity10aforb10agrass10aLag10aMeristem10aplant10aprairie10aRainfall manipulation1 aCarter, D.L.1 aVanderweide, B.1 aBlair, John, M. uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2012.01200.x