02612nas a2200169 4500008004100000245010100041210006900142300001600211490000700227520203500234100001702269700001802286700001702304700002202321700001802343856008102361 2016 eng d00aA before-and-after assessment of patch-burn grazing and riparian fencing along headwater streams0 abeforeandafter assessment of patchburn grazing and riparian fenc a1543–15530 v533 a
Fire and grazers (such as Bison bison) were historically among the most important agents for maintaining and managing tallgrass prairie, but we know little about their influences on water-quality dynamics in streams. We analyzed 2 y of data on total suspended solids (TSS), total N (TN), and total P (TP) (3 samples per week per stream during flow) in 3 prairie streams with fire and bison grazing treatments at Konza Prairie Biological Station, Kansas (USA), to assess whether fire and bison increase the concentrations of these water-quality variables. We quantified the spatial and temporal locations of bison (∼0.21 animal units/ha) with Global Positioning System collars and documented bison trails, paw patches, wallows, and naturally exposed sediment patches within riparian buffers. Three weeks post-fire, TN and TP decreased (t-test, p < 0.001), but TSS did not change. Bison spent <6% of their time within 10 m of the streams, increased the amount of exposed sediment in the riparian areas, and avoided wooded mainstem branches of stream (χ2 test, p < 0.001). Temporal trends suggest that low discharge or increased bison density in the stream may increase TSS and TP during the summer months. Our results indicate a weak connection between TSS and nutrients with bison access to streams over our 2-y study and indicate that low TSS and nutrients characterize tallgrass prairie streams with fire and moderate bison densities relative to surrounding land uses.
10aBison bison10aBos bison10aburning10aGrasslands10agrazers10aprescribed fire10astreams10atallgrass prairie10atotal nitrogen10atotal phosphorus10atotal suspended solids1 aLarson, D.M.1 aGrudzinski, B.P.1 aDodds, W., K.1 aDaniels, M.D.1 aSkibbe, A.M.1 aJoern, Anthony uhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1899/12-118.102265nas a2200169 4500008004100000245007800041210006900119300001300188490000700201520172700208100001701935700001801952700001801970700001701988700001802005856007202023 2013 eng d00aEcosystem characteristics of remnant, headwater tallgrass prairie streams0 aEcosystem characteristics of remnant headwater tallgrass prairie a239 -2490 v423 aNorth America has lost >95% of its native tallgrass prairie due to land conversion, making prairie streams one of the most endangered ecosystems. Research on the basic ecosystem characteristics of the remaining natural prairie streams will inform conservation and management. We examined the structure and function of headwater streams draining tallgrass prairie tracts at Osage Prairie in Missouri and the Konza Prairie Biological Station in Kansas and compared those values with literature values for streams draining agricultural watersheds in the region. We quantified physicochemical and biological characteristics for 2 yr. Streams at Osage and Konza were characterized by low nutrients and low suspended sediments (substantially lower than impacted sites in the region), slight heterotrophic status, and high temporal variability. Suspended sediments and nutrient concentrations were generally low in all prairie streams, but storms increased concentrations of both by 3- to 12-fold. Spring prescribed burns were followed by a slight increase in chlorophyll a and decreased nutrients, potentially due to greater light availability. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities at Osage showed seasonal patterns that were probably linked to variable hydrology. We found nine amphibian species using the Osage streams as habitat or breeding sites, but little usage at Konza was probably due to dry conditions and low discharge. Our study indicates that two remnant tallgrass prairie streams along a longitudinal gradient are fairly similar in terms of physicochemical features and have good water quality relative to agricultural watersheds but can differ considerably in macroinvertebrate and amphibian abundance.
1 aLarson, D.M.1 aDodds, W., K.1 aJackson, K.E.1 aWhiles, M.R.1 aWinders, K.R. uhttps://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/abstracts/42/1/239