TY - JOUR T1 - Partitioning assimilatory nitrogen uptake in streams: an analysis of stable isotope tracer additions across continents JF - Ecological Monographs Y1 - 2018 A1 - Tank, J.L. A1 - Marti, E. A1 - Riis, T. A1 - von Schiller, D. A1 - Reisinger, A.J. A1 - W. K. Dodds A1 - M.R. Whiles A1 - L.R. Ashkenas A1 - W.B. Bowden A1 - S. M. Collins A1 - Crenshaw, C.L. A1 - Crowl, T.A. A1 - Griffiths, N.A. A1 - Grimm, N.B. A1 - Hamilton, S.K. A1 - Johnson, S.L. A1 - McDowell, W.H. A1 - Norman, B.M. A1 - Rosi, E.J. A1 - Simon, K.S. A1 - Thomas, S.A. A1 - Webster, J.R. AB -

Headwater streams remove, transform, and store inorganic nitrogen (N) delivered from surrounding watersheds, but excessive N inputs from human activity can saturate removal capacity. Most research has focused on quantifying N removal from the water column over short periods and in individual reaches, and these ecosystem-scale measurements suggest that assimilatory N uptake accounts for most N removal. However, cross-system comparisons addressing the relative role of particular biota responsible for incorporating inorganic N into biomass are lacking. Here we assess the importance of different primary uptake compartments on reach-scale ammonium (NH4+-N) uptake and storage across a wide range of streams varying in abundance of biota and local environmental factors. We analyzed data from 17 15N-NH4+tracer addition experiments globally, and found that assimilatory N uptake by autotrophic compartments (i.e., epilithic biofilm, filamentous algae, bryophytes/macrophytes) was higher but more variable than for heterotrophic microorganisms colonizing detrital organic matter (i.e., leaves, small wood, and fine particles). Autotrophic compartments played a disproportionate role in N uptake relative to their biomass, although uptake rates were similar when we rescaled heterotrophic assimilatory N uptake associated only with live microbial biomass. Assimilatory NH4+-N uptake, either estimated as removal from the water column or from the sum uptake of all individual compartments, was four times higher in open- than in closed-canopy streams. Using Bayesian Model Averaging, we found that canopy cover and gross primary production (GPP) controlled autotrophic assimilatory N uptake while ecosystem respiration (ER) was more important for the heterotrophic contribution. The ratio of autotrophic to heterotrophic N storage was positively correlated with metabolism (GPP: ER), which was also higher in open- than in closed-canopy streams. Our analysis shows riparian canopy cover influences the relative abundance of different biotic uptake compartments and thus GPP:ER. As such, the simple categorical variable of canopy cover explained differences in assimilatory N uptake among streams at the reach scale, as well as the relative roles of autotrophs and heterotrophs in N storage. Finally, this synthesis links cumulative N uptake by stream biota to reach-scale N demand and provides a mechanistic and predictive framework for estimating and modeling N cycling in other streams.

VL - 88 UR - https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecm.1280 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - You are not always what we think you eat: selective assimilation across multiple whole-stream isotopic tracer studies JF - Ecology Y1 - 2014 A1 - W. K. Dodds A1 - Scott. L. Collins A1 - Hamilton, S.K. A1 - Tank, J.L. A1 - Johnson, S. A1 - Webster, J.R. A1 - Simon, K.S. A1 - M.R. Whiles A1 - Rantala, H.M. A1 - W.H. McDowell A1 - Peterson, S.D. A1 - Riis, T. A1 - Crenshaw, C.L. A1 - Thomas, S.A. A1 - Kristensen, P.B. A1 - Cheever, B.M. A1 - Flecker, A.S. A1 - Griffiths, N.A. A1 - Crowl, T. A1 - Rosi-Marshall, E.J. A1 - El-Sabaawi, R. A1 - Marti, E. AB -

Analyses of 21 15N stable isotope tracer experiments, designed to examine food web dynamics in streams around the world, indicated that the isotopic composition of food resources assimilated by primary consumers (mostly invertebrates) poorly reflected the presumed food sources. Modeling indicated that consumers assimilated only 33–50% of the N available in sampled food sources such as decomposing leaves, epilithon, and fine particulate detritus over feeding periods of weeks or more. Thus, common methods of sampling food sources consumed by animals in streams do not sufficiently reflect the pool of N they assimilate. Isotope tracer studies, combined with modeling and food separation techniques, can improve estimation of N pools in food sources that are assimilated by consumers. Food web studies that use putative food samples composed of actively cycling (more readily assimilable) and refractory (less assimilable) N fractions may draw erroneous conclusions about diets, N turnover, and trophic linkages of consumers. By extension, food web studies using stoichiometric or natural abundance approaches that rely on an accurate description of food-source composition could result in errors when an actively cycling pool that is only a fraction of the N pool in sampled food resources is not accounted for.

VL - 95 UR - https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/13-2276.1 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: Denitrification JF - Limnology and Oceanography Y1 - 2009 A1 - Mulholland, P.J. A1 - Hall, R.O. A1 - Sobota, D.J. A1 - W. K. Dodds A1 - Findlay, S.E.G. A1 - Grimm, N.B. A1 - Hamilton, S.K. A1 - W.H. McDowell A1 - O'Brien, J.M. A1 - Tank, J.L. A1 - L.R. Ashkenas A1 - Cooper, L.W. A1 - Dahm, C.N. A1 - Gregory, S.V. A1 - Johnson, S.L. A1 - Meyer, J.L. A1 - Peterson, B.J. A1 - Poole, G.C. A1 - Valett, H.M. A1 - Webster, J.R. A1 - Arango, C.P. A1 - Beaulieu, J.J. A1 - Bernot, M.J. A1 - Burgin, A.J. A1 - Crenshaw, C.L. A1 - Helton, A.M. A1 - Johnson, L.T. A1 - Niederlehner, B.R. A1 - Potter, J.D. A1 - Sheibley, R.W. A1 - Thomas, S.M. AB -

We measured denitrification rates using a field 15NO3− tracer-addition approach in a large, cross-site study of nitrate uptake in reference, agricultural, and suburban-urban streams. We measured denitrification rates in 49 of 72 streams studied. Uptake length due to denitrification (SWdenn) ranged from 89 m to 184 km (median of 9050 m) and there were no significant differences among regions or land-use categories, likely because of the wide range of conditions within each region and land use. N2 production rates far exceeded N2O production rates in all streams. The fraction of total NO3− removal from water due to denitrification ranged from 0.5% to 100% among streams (median of 16%), and was related to NH4+ concentration and ecosystem respiration rate (ER). Multivariate approaches showed that the most important factors controlling SWden were specific discharge (discharge / width) and NO3− concentration (positive effects), and ER and transient storage zones (negative effects). The relationship between areal denitrification rate (Uden) and NO3− concentration indicated a partial saturation effect. A power function with an exponent of 0.5 described this relationship better than a Michaelis-Menten equation. Although Uden increased with increasing NO3− concentration, the efficiency of NO3− removal from water via denitrification declined, resulting in a smaller proportion of streamwater NO3− load removed over a given length of stream. Regional differences in stream denitrification rates were small relative to the proximate factors of NO3− concentration and ecosystem respiration rate, and land use was an important but indirect control on denitrification in streams, primarily via its effect on NO3− concentration.

VL - 54 UR - https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.4319/lo.2009.54.3.0666 ER -